<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Vote Out Incumbents Democracy</title>
      <link>http://www.voidnow.org/</link>
      <description>Good government requires voting out bad politicians. </description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:15:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.35</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Oil &amp; Gasoline: The Politics</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://voidnow.org/watchblog/OilRig.gif" alt="oil rig photo - courtesy National Geographic" width="111" />There is a factual story to be told about the multi-million dollar war being waged between the Oil and Gas and Republican team on the one side, and the Democrats, consumer and environmental groups on the other. The factual story however, leaves much room for guesswork as to why the facts are as they are. Let's examine this story as logically as possible. </p>

<p>Folks don't want oil derricks in on their front lawns, town squares, or Central Park. Hence, laws were passed ages ago regulating where mining and drilling operations may take place, to protect towns, farmlands, waterways, and public lands for designated purposes like ANWR, all necessary to American quality of life. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/06/18/oil_gasoline_the_politics.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/06/18/oil_gasoline_the_politics.php</guid>
         <category>Staff Editorials</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:15:27 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Good Bye Incumbents.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I have been informed and checked out a new anti-incumbent web site. It is very nicely done and provides very good coverage of the current event issues that warrant voters critically evaluating the vote for or against their representative this November. </p>

<p>The site is called <a href="http://web.mac.com/johngwalsh/iWeb/Good_Bye_Incumbents/Welcome/Welcome.html" target="blank">"Good Bye Incumbents"</a> and it is a very well laid out and easy site to read and navigate. My only criticism is they don't permit comments to their column articles. It is however a great information site with lots of photos for those who need them to keep the visual interest and attention span going. Very well done. Congratulations to Jack Walsh, the site designer. And welcome Jack to the anti-incumbent movement. </p>

<p>UPDATE: Jack Walsh has implemented comments to his articles on his site. Good move. Check it out. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/05/29/good_bye_incumbents.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/05/29/good_bye_incumbents.php</guid>
         <category>Anti-incumbent News</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:15:23 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>GOP Out: Voter&apos;s Defense Guide</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>OK, now that the GOP is out, how can voters protect themselves from the Democratic Party? GOP out I say? OK, let me count the ways so we can move on to the Voter's Defense Guide.</p>

<p><b>GOP Out of power:</b></p>

<p>The easiest way to evidence this claim is to simply reference this week's news headlines and accompanying articles. <ul><li><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10366.html" target="blank">GOP cancer: Party could lose 20 more seats.</a></li><li><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10369.html" target="blank">GOP can't rely on money advantage now.</a></li><li><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10349.html" target="blank">GOP scrambles after Mississippi loss.</a></li><li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/14/AR2008051403611.html?nav=rss_politics" target="blank">After String of Losses, Republicans Face Crisis</a></li><li><a href="http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/republicans-look-for-new-message-no-sugarcoating-after-latest-defeat-2008-05-14.html" target="blank">Republicans look for new message, no sugarcoating after latest defeat.</a></li></ul>Nuff said!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/05/16/gop_out_voters_defense_guide.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/05/16/gop_out_voters_defense_guide.php</guid>
         <category>Staff Editorials</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:39:38 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Suffrage: Not what we expected.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Rational, thoughtful, educated, informed, and with a vested interest; these were the hopes of many of America's founders for the integral characteristics of those who vote and participate in the democracy portion of our Republic. Universal suffrage wasn't even close to being considered desirable at the founding of our nation.</p>

<p>Yet, universal suffrage is what we have delivered unto ourselves in the name of Women's rights, African American rights, Civil Rights, and Ignorant and Uneducated Rights. America decided that even the ignorant and uneducated are entitled to a voice in electing not just their district representatives of the U.S. House of Representatives as originally intended, but the Senate and the President as well. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/04/28/suffrage_not_what_we_expected.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/04/28/suffrage_not_what_we_expected.php</guid>
         <category>Staff Editorials</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:34:03 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A REVOLUTION TO TAKE BACK THE U.S. CONGRESS</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>by Nelson Lee Walker</p>

<p>I am proposing that we create a popular, bloodless, political revolution in our country.</p>

<p>I believe that it is very necessary, very possible, and very doable.</p>

<p>The object of this revolution is the destruction of the professional political class which currently dominates and corrupts the US Congress.</p>

<p>I am convinced, as are many, many voters, that the bulk of our country's political problems arises out of this 'permanent' Congressional political class, and their devotion to party power and to the financial special interests keeping them in power.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/30/a_revolution_to_take_back_the.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/30/a_revolution_to_take_back_the.php</guid>
         <category>Staff Editorials</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:45:17 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>America&apos;s Dysfunctional Politics</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here's a list of dysfunctions just from this week. Then we will take a gander at what we must do to end all this political dysfunction. </p>

<p>Josh White of the <a href="http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/politics/fedpage/index_xml/~3/250474265/AR2008031203748.html" target="blank"> Wash. Post</a> informs us: </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/16/americas_dysfunctional_politic.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/16/americas_dysfunctional_politic.php</guid>
         <category>Staff Editorials</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:48:14 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>First Large Emailing Completed</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>VOID has completed its first targeted large emailing of over 6000 emails to voters in the San Antonio, Texas area. The intention was to get this mailing out well before the Texas primary. We purchased the list well in advance, but, ran into enormous obstacles finding the right software to deliver 6000 emails in one swoop, and do it in a manner that would meet with our Host Mail Server sending limits designed to protect their shared hosting resources for other account holders. </p>

<p>Weeks went researching, then an injury, and more weeks of research and finally landing the right software, days went by configuring it, working out details with our Server Host, and finally, getting the email out. Regretfully, the email went out after the Texas Primary instead of before, when interest would have been at its height. We had a few very positive responses, and will likely see more in the coming days. </p>

<p>But, we will press on. The Board will meet shortly to authorize the purchase of another list for another targeted audience. This time, having all the infrastructure in place, we can be assured of a timely delivery in a state with its primary or caucus coming up. The email we are sending raises awareness of the need to vote anti-incumbent where possible, and of our organization and its purpose and mission. You can view the email being sent by <a href="http://voidnow.org/currentemail.php">clicking here.</a></p>

<p>Your thoughts, recommendations, and suggestions made in the comments here will be read and considered and very much appreciated. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/09/first_large_emailing_completed.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/09/first_large_emailing_completed.php</guid>
         <category>Weekly Newsletter</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:06:56 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>CREW has some good articles.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>CREW, <a href="http://www.citizensforethics.com/node/31185" target="blank">Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington</a>, writes: </p>

<p><strong>House has opened wide loopholes in ethics rules.</strong></p>

<p>As the U.S. House of Representatives continues its debate on how to proceed on ethics reform, an article in today's edition of The Hill is instructive.   Even though, the Senate is far from doing all the work on policing its members that needs to be done, that body is viewed as more aggressive on ethics issues.  Two former House members (Cunningham and Ney) are incarcerated.  Two more members (Jefferson and Renzi) are currently under indictment. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/09/crew_has_some_good_articles.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/09/crew_has_some_good_articles.php</guid>
         <category>Ethics and Corruption</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:35:52 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>TenureCorrupts sent us an Email</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Nelson Walker sent us the following email of interest: </p>

<p>Hi guys and gals, from tenurecorrupts.com</p>

<p> Now that the latest political buzzword is 'CHANGE', I guess I'm gonna have to get on the bandwagon...</p>

<p> I say the CHANGE that is needed in our country is to end the permanent status quo in Congress.</p>

<p> How many of you realize that the average reelection rate in the House of Representatives is over 98% ? And in the Senate it is over 92% ?</p>

<p> Do you really, really think that Congress does such a good job that it deserves to be reelected over and over again, ad infinitum ? Something is wrong !</p>

<p> Doesn't this sound like Congress has a real need for CHANGE ?</p>

<p> Since they are not likely to ever let us term limit them, we have to do it ourselves. And it is easy to do. We simply have to NEVER REELECT THEM !</p>

<p> During this Presidential Election, vote for whoever you want for president. But when it comes to your members of Congress in either House, or either party, vote only for challengers, never for incumbents.</p>

<p> If we succeed in knocking down their reelection rates to the low 70 or 80 percentile rates, they will get the message and let us have a constitutional amendment for term limits for Congress.</p>

<p> Now THAT would be REAL CHANGE !!!</p>

<p>--Nelson Walker, TenureCorrupts.Com</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/09/tenurecorrupts_sent_us_an_emai.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/09/tenurecorrupts_sent_us_an_emai.php</guid>
         <category>Anti-incumbent News</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:23:39 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Good old years of Corruption</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The following list was found at <a href="http://defendusa.blogspot.com/2005/11/corrupt-politician-watch.html" target="blank">DefendUSA</a> covering high profile government corruption from 2002 through 2005. But, the corruption continues in Washington with billions and billions of U.S. dollars stolen and misappropriated in Iraq, enormous losses to taxpayers as a result of continuing no-bid contracts, and the ever so subtle tactics of replacing taxes with user fees and stealing from our children's wages taxes for national debt being accumulated today. Not to mention Alaska's Jim Clark guilty plea, La. Dem. Jefferson's ongoing indictment, and this February's indictment of Rep. Rick Renzi (R) for extortion, wire fraud, money laundering and other charges related to a land deal in Arizona.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/07/good_old_years_of_corruption.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/07/good_old_years_of_corruption.php</guid>
         <category>Anti-incumbent News</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:59:34 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Primary Key to Anti-Incumbent Voters</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Primaries and Caucuses are the primary place for anti-incumbent voters to register their initial anti-incumbent vote. Far too many American voters assume the main ballot entry is for President. It is not. Take a look at how many seats are up for grabs in my own district. Your district has very similar ballot options for the Primary election. To vote anti-incumbent means voting for the challengers, and the place to do that first is in the Primary elections.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/03/primary_key_to_antiincumbent_v.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/03/03/primary_key_to_antiincumbent_v.php</guid>
         <category>Anti-incumbent News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:49:17 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>VOID Wants Volunteers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Through the generosity of our membership, <a href="http://voidnow.org/overview.php">Vote Out Incumbents Democracy</a> has funds to direct email voters in some targeted cities about VOID and The Plan. But, to date, VOID has grown to this point on the hundreds of volunteer hours provided by a handful of people. We have reached our growth limit without more volunteers. VOID is reaching out to thousands of voters, and three people volunteering to run VOID simply cannot handle the work load anymore. We have grown too big and our operations too complex for a 3 person Board of Directors to carry the workload.  </p>

<p>On the one hand, this is great news. We have succeeded in growing beyond our resources. On the other hand, the bad news is we cannot grow further nor efficiently without help from VOID supporters. Volunteers who can email others, who can research the web and copy and paste some challenger information, who can reply to some newly interested persons, who can blog on other sites about VOID, are all needed if VOID is to continue to grow and change the way Congress abuses us and our tax dollars. </p>

<p>If you can help with a few hours per week or month, <b>please</b> <a href="https://voidnow.org/volunteerform.php" target="blank">CLICK HERE</a> to provide us with information so we can contact you. And thank you for your continued commitment and support. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/02/15/void_wants_volunteers.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/02/15/void_wants_volunteers.php</guid>
         <category>Weekly Newsletter</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:59:43 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Only 1 Real Anti-Incumbent Organization</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I am back in the swing of Googling the terms '2008 anti-incumbent' to take the pulse of the movement. The term is being bandied about many more folks than in previous cycles this decade. That's a good thing.  But, their commentaries seem to miss the mark. They use the anti-incumbent term to support their incumbents, their incumbent party, or their incumbent ideological wishful dreams. </p>

<p>However, their comments don't reflect a genuine understanding of the anti-incumbent movement; obvious by their numerous references to an anti-incumbent mood. Mood and movement are two entirely different things. VOID is the only legitimate anti-incumbent movement, and all others miss the mark entirely as demonstrated in following paragraphs and quotes. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/02/13/only_1_real_antiincumbent_orga.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/02/13/only_1_real_antiincumbent_orga.php</guid>
         <category>Anti-incumbent News</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:21:32 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>NewsWeek: Incumbents At Risk</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Tom Blakely's article at The Hill, <a href="http://thehill.com/op-eds/no-incumbent-is-safe-2008-02-14.html" target="blank">Analysis: Incumbents At Risk This Year</a>, is making the rounds at publications like Newsweek and Politico. But, we have seen such articles in past elections, and the risk was not realized. Blakely is marking one race, and writing about voter sentiment. But, VOID members know, it will take more than individual sentiments to make an anti-incumbent sentiment produce an anti-incumbent movement at the polls. It will take the growth of the VOID organization to contact and organize voters in that direction knowing they are acting in concert with each other by the millions. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/02/11/newsweek_incumbents_at_risk.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/02/11/newsweek_incumbents_at_risk.php</guid>
         <category>Anti-incumbent News</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:32:29 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Economic Stimulus: Good, Bad, &amp; Ugly]]></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>From the meeting of the world's elites in Davos, Switzerland to working American voters and their politicians, the <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,325192,00.html" target="blank">economic stimulus plan</a> having passed the House is creating a very positive stir as Americans look forward to getting some cash back from their taxes. Stock markets around the globe rebounded. The hope is Americans will rush out and buy American made products and American based services, and businesses will apply their kickback to hiring more employees. Sounds Good! But, is it? </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/01/25/economic_stimulus_good_bad_ugl.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.voidnow.org/2008/01/25/economic_stimulus_good_bad_ugl.php</guid>
         <category>Staff Editorials</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:55:28 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
